Nike Golf vs Adidas Golf in 2025: What’s Your Look?

Updated on: September 11, 2025 • ~12 min read

Author: Graeme Whiles

All of the ratings and opinions found in this article come from our own in-house testing and, therefore, are based entirely on our experience with each brand. For the most accurate results, we always recommend doing your own research and testing.

Nike Golf on the left, Adidas Golf on the right, both in dynamic swing or street posture.

Verdict & Quick Pick

Nike Golf and Adidas Golf both offer strong options, but they serve different priorities.

Nike Golf leans street. Relaxed fits, bolder styling, and a clear lifestyle crossover make it feel more like off-course fashion that happens to work on the tee box. If you’re after a bit of edge or personality, it’s there.

Adidas Golf is built for consistency. The fabrics are reliable, the fits are cleaner, and there’s a functional polish to the whole range. It’s made for players who want performance that blends in, not stands out.

Three Putt’s thoughts: If you like your golfwear to say something, Nike will suit you. If you’d rather it stay quiet and just work, Adidas is the safer call.

Either way, both are dependable. It just depends on what you’re looking for.

Head-to-Head Comparison Summary

Best For…

Detailed Comparison

1. Brand Overview: Nike Golf vs Adidas Golf

Nike Golf

Nike Golf sits at the intersection of sport and streetwear. What started as Tiger’s tailored red polo has evolved into a relaxed, modern collection that blends athletic tech with fashion-forward silhouettes. 

Looser cuts, oversized tops, bold graphics, and crossover gear (see: Jordan Golf) make it a natural fit for younger or style-conscious players who want more from their kit than quiet performance.

Fearless, expressive, and unapologetically modern.

Adidas Golf

Adidas Golf has leaned into precision. Their golf line is built on performance materials and structured fits, but always with versatility in mind. Think: neutral tones, streamlined layers, and subtle logo placements. It’s not flashy, but it fits, whether it’s on-course, at dinner, or during travel. Sustainability plays a big role, too, with Primegreen fabrics and verified sourcing across their core line.

Refined, consistent, and made to move well.

2. Key Features & Tech

Nike Golf

• Dri-FIT fabric in polos and midlayers for moisture-wicking and airflow
• Lightweight construction across tops and outerwear
• Graphic-led collections, including Jordan collabs and NRG drops
• Relaxed silhouettes with soft stretch and vented hems
• Subtle tech (hidden pockets, bonded seams) in selected pieces
  

Adidas Golf

• HEAT.RDY cooling yarns designed for peak temps
• RAIN.RDY waterproof tech in outerwear and trousers
• Odour-control finishing in base layers
• UPF 50+ sun protection in polos
• Consistent use of Primegreen recycled poly across collections
• Structured panels and performance taping for durability

Split close-up of fabric textures.

Verdict:

• Nike: 8.5/10 — smooth stretch, clean tech, more style-led
• Adidas: 9/10 — better technical range, strong in heat and rain

3. Price & Value

Nike and Adidas both sit in the mid-to-premium tier for golfwear, but they prioritise value differently.

Nike leans into accessibility with street-led designs and seasonal drops that rarely push into true premium pricing. Tees and midlayers are competitively priced, especially outside of limited releases.

Adidas, meanwhile, commands slightly higher pricing across the board, but backs it with more advanced tech, better wet-weather pieces, and more consistent construction quality.

Price Ranges Table (RRP):

Nike gives you bold, graphic-led staples for £10–£20 less across most categories. Adidas tracks closer to traditional golf brands in price, but adds more weatherproofing, versatility, and polish.

Verdict:

• Nike: 8/10 — solid value for design-forward basics
• Adidas: 8.5/10 — more expensive, but earns it with build and tech

D. Fit & Sizing

Nike Golf

• Generally athletic-to-relaxed fit, often looser than traditional golfwear
• Outerwear and tees can run oversized, so we recommend checking product images before buying
• Boxier cuts through shoulders and torso; drop hems common
• May require sizing down for a more tailored look
• Limited availability in tall or extended sizes
  
  

Adidas Golf

• Regular-to-athletic cut with clean tapering through chest and legs
• True to size across most garments and consistent between collections
• Good balance between movement and structure for swing comfort
• Easy layering without bunching
• Strong inclusion of tall, plus, and short sizing in core products

Verdict:

• Nike: 7.5/10 — relaxed, comfortable, but variable across drops
• Adidas: 9/10 — more consistent, better size range, and layering fit

E. Style Versatility

Nike Golf

• Streetwear-led aesthetic that works well beyond the course
• Easy to pair with cargos, sneakers, and caps for everyday wear
• Statement graphics and oversized fits fit right in at the range or a bar
• Less suited to country club dress codes or formal settings
• Best for younger or style-forward players

Adidas Golf

• Clean, modern cuts designed for crossover appeal
• Fits club dress codes while still looking current
• Midlayers and polos transition well to smart-casual settings
• Great for travel, events, and understated off-course wear
• Works across a broader age and style range

Street collage with both brands styled

Verdict:

• Nike: 8.5/10 — strong lifestyle potential, but more casual
• Adidas: 9/10 — versatile, polished, and wearable anywhere

F. Quality & Sustainability

Nike Golf

• Uses recycled polyester in much of its range, but lacks full transparency on sourcing
• Quality is solid on core tees and outerwear, though occasional stitching issues are reported in midlayers
• Seasonal drops (like Jordan Golf) focus more on design than long-term durability
• No formal sustainability certifications on most golf lines
• Good for style-led buyers who want some eco-integration without deep scrutiny

Adidas Golf

• Primegreen recycled polyester is used across most products
• Bluesign®-certified supply chain with clear sustainability targets
• Seams, taping, and zippers feel reliably constructed across price tiers
• Outerwear is particularly durable and holds shape and function over time
• Clear commitment to environmental responsibility, especially in golf

Product tags

Verdict:

• Nike: 7.5/10 — decent material choices, but light on transparency and long-term build
• Adidas: 9/10 — strong across durability, eco materials, and verified sourcing

G. Digital Experience (Web/App)

Nike Golf

• Simple, clean site UX with fast load, easy checkout
• Nike App offers quick restocks, saved sizing, and order tracking
• Golf is treated as a sub-category with minimal editorial or style support
• Filtering could be improved (e.g., can’t easily shop by fit or layer type)
• Limited golf-specific lookbooks or styling guidance

Adidas Golf

• Golf has a dedicated hub with curated collections and seasonal features
• Filtering by fit, tech (HEAT.RDY, RAIN.RDY), and product type is smooth
• Style guides and lookbooks help visualize layering and outfits
• “Shop the look” and “Complete the outfit” tools are useful
• Strong cross-device consistency — desktop and app both work well

Verdict:

• Nike: 7/10 — sleek shopping experience, but limited golf-specific content
• Adidas: 9/10 — better guided shopping, deeper content, more helpful for first-time buyers

H. Customer Support & Returns

Nike Golf

• Support via Nike App chat, online help portal, and email
• 30-day return window on most items (unworn, unwashed)
• Return process is self-service, with prepaid labels in most cases
  Fast refund turnaround, but mixed reviews on resolving product issues
• Live chat often bots first, with agent handoff slower during busy periods
• No golf-specific support or expertise

Adidas Golf

• Support through email and online help centre ,but no live chat
• 30-day returns standard; simple online process, prepaid labels included
• Clear, well-documented policy with good FAQs and troubleshooting
• Customer service is generally responsive within 24–48 hours
• Slightly slower refunds than Nike, but more consistent resolution quality

Screenshot of each brand’s returns page or FAQ section for comparison

Verdict:

• Nike: 8/10 — fast, mostly smooth, but inconsistent during product issues
• Adidas: 8.5/10 — slower to respond, but a more transparent process and stronger follow-through

Our Pick

If you want relaxed fits, bold styling, and golfwear that feels just as natural on the street as it does on the range, Nike Golf brings the energy. It’s for players who care as much about how they look walking up to the tee as they do about their swing plane.

If you lean polished, prefer refined performance, and want clothing that transitions cleanly from course to clubhouse, Adidas Golf is the sharper, more versatile choice. Quietly technical, comfortably reliable.

Final Tally: Nike Golf vs Adidas Golf

Frequently Asked Questions About Nike Golf Versus Adidas Golf

Do any pro golfers still use Nike clubs?

Not anymore. Since Nike exited the golf equipment business in 2016, most pros who previously used Nike clubs have switched to other brands, like TaylorMade, Callaway, or Titleist. Some still wear Nike apparel but swing different sticks.

Which brand is better for golf gear, Nike or Adidas?

It depends on what you value. Nike offers bolder styling, relaxed fits, and strong streetwear crossover. Adidas focuses on technical performance, sustainability, and more versatile, structured looks. Adidas also wins on layering and all-weather gear.

Why was Nike Golf discontinued?

Nike stopped making golf clubs, balls, and bags in 2016 due to declining market share and lack of traction against dominant equipment brands. They chose to focus on apparel and footwear, where they remain strong.

Why do people choose Adidas over Nike for golfwear?

Adidas tends to offer better fit consistency, stronger layering systems, and more functional tech (like HEAT.RDY and RAIN.RDY). It's also a leader in sustainability, which matters to many buyers.

Do athletes prefer Nike or Adidas?

Nike dominates athlete endorsements across most sports, including golf. Think Tiger Woods, Rory McIlroy (apparel only), and Scottie Scheffler. But Adidas appeals to players looking for a technical edge and a more understated look.

Did Tiger Woods ever use Nike golf clubs?

Yes. Tiger used Nike clubs throughout much of his career, especially in the 2000s. He switched to TaylorMade clubs after Nike exited the equipment market.

What brand of golf clubs do most PGA players use now?

TaylorMade, Titleist, Callaway, and Ping are the dominant brands on Tour. Nike clubs haven’t been in play since their equipment division shut down.

Does Rory McIlroy still use Nike clubs?

No. Rory now plays with TaylorMade clubs but continues to wear Nike apparel and shoes under his long-term endorsement deal.